en2Foresight

The Future of Being Alone

Prepared for Designing for Tomorrow, 5 October 2026

The freedom to be alone.

More people now choose time alone. It stays a choice only when company and help are within reach, on their own terms.

Our recommendation

Build services where the person who is alone decides when company and help arrive. Start with one venue.

See the first test

The film series

Seven short films. Each one answers one part of the question.

Film 1 arrives shortly. The page checks for it each time it loads.

The podcast

A host and an analyst talk the report through. 10:07.

Press play to begin

0:0010:07

Four questions

The four questions you asked, one at a time.

Question 1 of 4

Is being alone becoming a problem, or a choice?

Both, and they are coming apart. Being alone is a situation, loneliness is a feeling, solitude is a choice. The same person can move between them in one day.

Watch film 1: Same room, different needs
HALF
Of 18,000 adults in a worldwide survey, more than half picked solitude as a key activity for rest.
  • Solitude, chosen
  • A need not met
  • Company or help that answers

The decision

One experiment, one owner, one review date.

Recommended first move

Redesign how one venue welcomes people who arrive alone

It tests the whole idea in one journey you can watch. If people who come alone feel in control, they come back.

  1. 1Pick one partner venue: a restaurant, pub, theatre or event.
  2. 2Make booking and arriving alone easy and ordinary.
  3. 3Offer company as an invitation, with an equally comfortable way to decline.
  4. 4Compare with what happens today.

Measure two things

  • Do solo guests come back?
  • Do they feel in control?

Go

Return visits rise and people still feel in control. Extend it to more venues.

Change or stop

It feels pushy or awkward, or people return less. Change it or stop.

Strongest objection. Hostelworld and Joining Tables show company can be offered. They do not show your visitors want it. That is what the test is for.

Agree the thresholds and the review date before the test starts. Uptake of the invitation is useful to understand, but it is not the goal.

Open the one-page brief

Where can you act?

Choose where your team works. The films and the move that fit will light up.

If your remit is homes and support

Backup the resident controls

Help that starts with a prompt the person sets, and reaches a named person only when they allow it.

Strongest objection. In a dementia trial, a fuller technology package did not keep people at home longer: 127 weeks against 128. Devices alone are not the answer; the response is.

Film 6: Who answers the alert?

If your remit is digital services

AI with a real hand-over

An AI companion with clear limits and a route to a named human service.

Strongest objection. The hand-over only works if a person is there to accept it. Age UK South Gloucestershire uses AI while people wait for a human befriender.

Film 4: Who does the companion hand over to?

Four futures

Four possible futures, and the sign to watch for each.

These are possible futures, not predictions. They can happen side by side. Each one comes with a sign to watch and what you would do if it appears.

Future
Today
Watch for
Then

Places for one

TodaySolo theatre nights, single-diner formats and optional company already exist.
Watch forSolo formats spreading and people coming back to them.
ThenExtend the arrival test, but only if return and control both hold.

Separate lives, shared support

TodayHomeshare schemes swap a spare room for company or help.
Watch forA matching service at city scale, with fair terms and an easy way out.
ThenFind a partner and test the agreement: privacy, roles and exit.

Independent, with backup

TodayCheck-in apps, home sensors and gentle nudges are in use.
Watch forEscalation rules the resident sets, written into a council or housing tender.
ThenBuild the response partnership before adding any monitoring.

AI with a way back

TodayAI companions keep people company while they wait for a human befriender.
Watch forPublished outcomes, and a hand-over that a person actually accepts.
ThenExpand if people benefit. Change or stop if there is harm or no benefit.